Teach young people to question AI while learning to use it
A magazine project gives children a voice in the debate about AI, alongside practical risks that education needs to address.
What happened
Courrier international reports on an MIT Technology Review issue developed with a magazine for younger readers. The project asked children and teenagers how they experience AI and what they want from it.
Why it matters
The coverage argues for teaching judgment as well as technical use. It identifies unsuitable material, mistaken answers and reliance on chatbots as reasons to guide young users.
The young people described a range of thoughtful reactions. The project used everyday situations, including creative work and personal messages, to explore where they felt comfortable using AI.
The editorial case is for helping children navigate the technology while keeping their own agency. Their views are part of that discussion, alongside adults’ concerns.
What this does not tell us
This is reported discussion and an educational argument. It does not measure the effects of a particular teaching programme.
FOR PEOPLE
Benefits and downsidesThe source advocates AI literacy and young people retaining agency, while identifying inappropriate content, reliance instead of judgment and misplaced trust in wrong answers as concrete risks.
FOR AI AND ITS OPERATORS
Benefits and downsidesIt describes expanding access to tools that can speak, create and act for young users, alongside unreliable answers as a limitation.
These are two separate readings of what the sources describe. Reported claims and risks do not by themselves establish a real-world effect.
Original sources · 1
- Teenagers will have to grow up with artificial intelligence. ↗Courrier international · 2026-08-27
Reporting discovered in France. Discovery market does not mean the event happened there.
What is your take?
Ask a question, add useful context or share a different perspective. Keep the conversation respectful and grounded.